Signatures on documents

When F received copies of his  never seen before Care Plan Reviews and the October 2010 Assessment, he found that NONE were signed by him.

F asked Mr Leak why  F was NOT asked to verify and sign the ASAQ.  He was told that as a Social Worker was present, it was NOT necessary for  F to sign it,  confirming  veracity of his answers. This would suggest that other individuals were also NOT asked to verify and sign their ASAQ’s. 

This might also suggest that not only F’s ASAQ  but  that  of others may have been competed whenever, by whomever and wherever, without  the assessed individual being aware.  The ASAQ  scored to reflect the desired outcome/total.

F asked the Disability Law Advice centre about this matter.  He was told that unverified  and UNSIGNED  assessment document IS NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT IS WRITTEN ON AND SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN USED IN AN ASSESSMENT PROCESS, as it is unsafe and unreliable.

As F could not find any information,  on 29th July 2014, he asked senior Professor in Law about this point.

Professor Chalmer’s reply  is interesting.  It is clear that RBKC by not asking anyone to sign their  documents, expose themselves to criticism and inability to prove that the documents were completed in the individual’s presence.

Mr Leak may have been right, but the caveat here is that,  as long as the document remains UNSIGNED, BOTH parties MUST be SATISFIED with the answers.  However, as soon as either party disputes them, the documents becomes legally unsafe, as there is NO proof that the service user had seen the document, let alone agreed with its content.

This situation is avoided, by simply NOT giving the service user a copy of the Review.  Job done.

He sent a number of FOI Requests to local authorities, regarding the necessity for a signature of the Care Plan Reviews.   From the replies received, the one from Waltham Forest on  16th July 2015  is a typical reply.  It states that the service users  get two copies of their Reviews; they are asked to sign one, confirming veracity of the information.

 

.  

.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.