Receipt of unauthorised information

When F received copies of the documents sent to the LGO, he found, to his utter astonishment, that  many of the Care Plan Reviews, not only referred to his HIV+ status, but also disclose details of the condition’s progress, the life saving medication he must take and the inevitable side-effects he suffers as a consequence.   

This specific  information should have been removed in May 2010, had RBKC complied with F’s May 2010 Amendment to his Information Sharing Agreement.

When F discovered the existence of the NHS Statutory Restrictions and ICO’s Data Sharing Code of Practice, on   17th September 2015 he asked Ms Pook, LGO’s official what  action  had  she taken when these documents were discovered.

It is F’s opinion that the LGO should have perhaps alerted RBKC to this event, or even informed the ICO, as the LGO was in no way entitled to receive this specific information.

In her reply, dated  23rd September 2015  Ms Pook told F that she did not contact the ICO, as NO DISCLOSURE had OCCURRED .

The question remains:  What legal right has the LGO got to receive  highly confidential medical information, including details of person’s HIV+ status, without consent, and keep it for undefined period of time in undefined  storage locations; most probably permitting access to  it by any Tom, Dick, Harry and itinerant bottle washes, without any oversight?

The receipt of such information by others is addressed in Soho HIV Clinic incident in September 2015.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.